Q: Where do you think he [Marshall McLuhan] was wrong, or irresponsible?
A [Neil Postman]: Well I think the whole idea of hot medium and cool medium didn't really
work. I think in the end I believe Marshall gave it up after awhile. But it
was interesting as almost everything he said was interesting. He was trying
to construct a new kind of taxonomy for perceiving media -- and that is a
taxonomy that has to deal with how any particular medium massages or
affects your sensorium. But when he tried to explain this idea by
categorizing media as hot and cool and then giving definitions, the
foundation of the definitions was confused because sometimes he seemed to
be concentrating on the mechanical reproduction, the process of a medium;
sometimes he seemed to be focused on something else that was not entirely
clear. Moreover, if you tried to use his own system: something like print,
which he thought was a hot medium, could just as easily have been a cool
medium, because that, of all media, seemed to give you the least
information. That was one of the characteristics of a cool medium, that it
didn't supply you hotly with lots of information so that there had to be
greater participation on the part of the audience to fill in. Well, it
always puzzled me that he'd call print a hot medium and as I remember, I
think he also called radio a hot medium, which seemed to me to fulfill the
conditions of what he meant by cool medium.
So that was kind of confusing, and it was too bad because when he became
almost a cult figure and a guru of the electronic age, many people focused
on this hot and cool medium distinction, and they couldn't always take it
very far because they were confused. But I don't think he was disturbed
about that. If I had said to him what I just said to you, he would have
said, "Well, okay, if it's not straight, make up a better one." But he
would have given the lead as to what to look at, and we've had students
here at New York University, that have tried to invent better ones. They
would have a value in their work they would have to attribute to McLuhan's
inspiration.
-- Neil
Postman.
"Neil
Postman on Marshall McLuhan"
[Unattributed interview. Apparently, this quote comes from an interview
of Neil Postman conducted as part of the production of a CD-ROM,
Understanding McLuhan. The book
Forward through the rearview mirror:
Reflections on and by Marshall McLuhan (edited by Paul Benedetti and
Nancy DeHart, MIT Press, 1997) has excerpts from the interview. It says
that interviews quoted in the book were all conducted between September
1994 and May 1995 by Andrew Heintzman, Mark Hyland, Nick de Pencier,
Evan Solomon, and Duncan Wilson of
Shift magazine in conjunction with
Southam New Media, Toronto.]