Before there was text, memory was all. Bards commonly
held in mental suspension tens of thousands of lines of verse; sages
were esteemed according to what they knew. Later, when text had arrived
but not yet saturated the empire of possibility, an individual's
knowledge -- what was stored at the beck of comprehending memory --
determined his or her standing and function in the society of the day.
In Goethe's time -- the early nineteenth century -- a devoted person
could still hope to know what was vital across the range of disciplines.
So runs the cliché.
But after Goethe the sluices burst open. Nowadays no one person can hope
to grasp more than a fraction of even a single topic area. The whole
conception of what memory is, or could be, has been revolutionized, by
which I mean to say
exported. Human memory migrated into books
and the classifying systems that gave a map for stored information.
These paved the way for the database and the accessing tools of
software. By degrees we have become comfortable with the idea that
knowledge is less something had, or possessed, and more something
available, to be gotten as needed. Our conception has changed, from
internal to external. To be educated, increasingly, means to command the
tools and principles of access. This is not to say that past a point one
does not need to know what to
do with the retrieved data. But
still, effectively the paradigm has shifted.
... We are now in the age of
hypersaturation; we are, sure as can be, entrusting most of what we
think we need to know to a memory prosthesis.
This is the real point of the digital book -- its true
revolutionary, or better,
evolutionary, potential. What matters
is not that some reader might carry
Lord Jim around to read from
his pocket screen, but that we will very soon begin to accept -- and
then expect -- that we are not only never out of touch with people, at
least potentially, but also that we are never apart from our information
and ideas. The digital book points the way to the next step, storing a
significant portion of our mental contents -- the data, or
"intelligence" itself -- in an apparatus that is always ready at hand.
We are putting a surprising new spin on what futurist Vannevar Bush
(in the pages of
The Atlantic Monthly) conjured up a half century
ago with his "Memex," the mechanical device that would place all human knowledge
within reach of the prompting finger.
-- Sven Birkerts. "The book is the network, the network is knowledge"
The Atlantic (Sept 10, 1998).
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/unbound/digicult/dc980910.htm