These stories were of the wholesale abandonment or destruction of rare and
valuable books by public institutions, even of those books willed by
individuals to those public institutions. It was not as if librarians were
merely ambivalent or negligent of the books in their charge, but as if they
actually
hated them, as workers in chocolate factories come to hate
chocolate. One bookseller in Wales told me that he found seventeenth- and
eighteenth-century books dumped in a skip outside a supposed institution of
learning. Another found the librarians of a county library walking over the
sixteenth-century books that they had pulled from the shelves preparatory
to throwing them away in order to make space for more computer terminals.
The process is called
deacquisitioning, a truly Orwellian term, as if
demolition or bombing were called
debuilding; and one of the justifications
for the process is that records show that the
deacquisitioned items have
not been consulted for years, for decades. A library is no longer a
repository of all that has been thought or written but a department store
where the readers determine by their borrowing habits what stock should be
held. If they want Dan Brown rather than the
Summa Theologica, then that is
what libraries should carry. The customer is king.
-- Anthony Daniels. "The digital challenge, I: Loss & gain, or the fate of the book,"
The New Criterion (November 2012)
http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-digital-challenge--I--Loss---gain--or-the-fate-of-the-book-7468